ase concerning the attribution of the share of power generated in the Bhakra- Nangal and Beas Projects as per the scheme for apportionment of assets and liabilities between the successor States in the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966.The Court while dismissing the plaintiff’s claim to 12% of the power generated held that since at the time of the execution of the Bhakra-Nangal Project and the Beas Project , Himachal Pradesh was not a full fledged State it didn’t posses the rights and powers under Articles 162 and 246(3) of the Constitution over its land and water and it was the Union of India which had such rights and powers over its land and water by virtue of the provisions of Article 73 and Article 246(4) of the Constitution. However, the court granted the plaintiff relief by increasing its share of power generated from 2.5 % to 7.19%.