Order No. 2 of the Inspectorate for Supervision in the Sphere of Construction, Housing and Communal Services under the Cabinet of Ministers “On approval of the Regulation on the procedure for introducing the electronic system "Risk Analysis" in the implementation of control at construction sites, in the management of apartment buildings, in the field of drinking water supply and wastewater disposal”.

This Order approves the Regulation on the procedure for introducing the electronic system "Risk Analysis" in the implementation of control at construction sites, in the management of apartment buildings, in the field of drinking water supply and wastewater disposal. The system is intended to identify the likelihood of legal violations by business entities through objective risk assessment criteria and is aligned with existing legislation on state control and protection of entrepreneurs’ rights.
The regulation establishes general principles for risk assessment, specifying that risk analysis must rely on available administrative data, statistical information, complaints, media sources, and other lawful information sources without requiring additional documents from businesses. The electronic system itself cannot serve as a direct basis for sanctions, and risk analysis must not interfere with business activities. Businesses are classified into three categories based on a point-score system: high risk (81–100 points), medium risk (61–81 points), and low risk (up to 61 points). High- and medium-risk entities may be subject to preventive measures and inspections in accordance with applicable legislation, while low-risk entities are not subject to inspections.
The annexes define detailed risk indicators for seven supervised sectors: construction projects, maintenance and use of apartment buildings, apartment building management, heating supply systems, drinking water supply organizations, use of water supply and wastewater services, and organizations drilling groundwater wells for drinking water production. In each sector, serious non-compliance issues carry the highest weight of 81 points, while secondary violations are assigned lower scores. Examples include operating without required registrations or permits, failing to comply with technical and safety standards, poor management of communal infrastructure, breaches of water quality requirements, unauthorized connections to water networks, and violations of groundwater well operation rules. These indicators enable the electronic system to automatically determine the risk level of regulated entities and guide supervisory activities.